User talk:Nick xylas

Hello, welcome to Wikipedia. Here's some tips:

You can introduce yourself on the new users page
If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username.
You can sign your name using three tildes, like ~~~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.
Remember to use the show preview button before you save a page.
If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page.

Other useful pages are: how to edit, how to write a great article, naming conventions, manual of style and the Wikipedia policies.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Angela . 22:41, Mar 13, 2004 (UTC)

Conlang

In the discussion on Westcountry Brythonic, you state "one of my favorite pastimes is designing a version of Modern English based on the premise "What if the Norman Conquest had never happened?" — but I don't put it up at Wikipedia and pretend it's an attested language!". Have you put it up anywhere on the web, as I would be interested in learning about it? Nick xylas 18:51, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)

No, I haven't. I don't even have just one version of it, I have several, which vary according to my mood and to what extent I want non-Norman English to be influenced by Norse, or whether I want non-Norman English to have started borrowing words from French during the Enlightenment, as German and Dutch did. Another of my "what-if" languages (also never made available for public consumption) is my "What if a Romance language had developed in Wales" language. Basically, I took the sound changes that Latin words went through when they were borrowed into Welsh and made a Romance language out of them. I thought of it because one of my professors in graduate school used the term "the Romance language that almost became Welsh" to describe the late Latin spoken in Britain up till the 5th century. --Angr 19:22, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Aren't neo-Cornishes close to being conlangs? True, there may be MSs that contain large amounts of Cornish in them, but the spoken language is inadequately recorded, and much of what is about today is reconstruction or even guessing (not to mention borrowing from Breton), rather than an organic version of the original. Everson the publisher will no doubt disagree. 193.39.159.3

Hayley Savage

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your contributions to the Hayley Savage article, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information, take a look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy editing! Calton | Talk 13:06, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Repost?

Regarding Devonian language, I can't find any evidence this is a repost. There's nothing in the deletion log and no old AFDs link to it. Why do you say it's a repost? I de-tagged for now.--Kchase T 19:04, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It appears to be a repost of material from Westcountry Brythonic, which was voted for deletion a while back. Also, most of the article is duplicated in the Cornish language and Southwestern Brythonic pages. Nick xylas 19:36, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's sufficiently different that I didn't think it was quite speedyable (it's unclear to me whether it's even the same language). I redirected, but feel free to take it to RfD or AfD to get an audience with more understanding of linguistics. Cheers!--Kchase T 19:51, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Wessex Society

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Wessex Society, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Wessex Society seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Wessex Society, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 20:50, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Nick xylas! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 120 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Devina Symes - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:23, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Devina Symes

The article Devina Symes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

notability concerns

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Santa Claus of the Future (talk) 04:54, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wyvern.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wyvern.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sven Manguard Wha? 04:38, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Wessex Regionalist Party logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Wessex Regionalist Party logo.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bob Re-born (talk) 10:25, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Wessex Regionalist Party logo.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Wessex Regionalist Party logo.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bob Re-born (talk) 10:26, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Wessex Regionalist Party logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Wessex Regionalist Party logo.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 11:02, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]